"The inequities of today are so great that sustaining
the present patterns of development and consumption
would mean perpetuating similar inequities for future generations"
(UNDP, 1998)

EVALUATION

The aim of the evaluation is to find out how children's understanding and behaviour to environmental and developmental issues has changed as a result of the project. Specifically this relates to "a change in knowledge, understanding and attitudes about sustainable living" a core objective identified in the project formulation.

Children working out their 'Global Footprint'
at the beginning of the project, October, 2000


The following sections show and discuss the various evaluation results:

Qualitative Evaluation

A small percentage of the three classes involved in the project undertook qualitative evaluation in the form of a post–it activity and recorded group discussion. In addition children from a 'control school' (which had a similar social and economic background to the project schools) undertook the same activities with slight modifications to help see the impact of the project.


Post-it activity

Children were asked to think of their responses to the following areas from a global and local environmental perspective: things I feel happy about;   things I feel worried about;   things I would like to change in the future;   what I can do to change things.   The headings were on sheets of A3 paper and children used post-it notes to write or draw a response to each heading. Table 1 show responses followed by a description of the methodology. Table 1b shows results from the control group. Discussion of post-it activity results in conjunction with the recorded group discussion (see below) and specific limitations can be found here


Recorded group discussion

In pairs children discussed a set of questions relating to ecological footprint trips and classroom sessions in addition to their general understanding of the global footprint concept. With the permission of children and teacher the discussion was recorded. Table 2 show responses followed by a description of the methodology. Table 2b shows results from the control group. Discussion of recorded group discussion results in conjunction with post-it activity results and specific limitations can be found here


Quantatitive Evaluation

Questionnaire

Every pupil participating in the project completed a simple questionnaire (see below) relating to the various visits and lessons that had made up the project as well as the effects these had had on understanding and behaviour. The questionnaires were filled in anonymously , with time and assistant given to enable all pupils to complete them. For results, and analysis go to table 3


Ecological Footprint Score

At the beginning of the project every pupil participating worked out for themselves their ‘ecological footprint score’ as part of the lesson led by the Earthcentre. At the end of the project, on the visit to the Earthcentre, this activity was revisited by pupils and they worked out their score again. For results and analysis go to table 4


Children enjoying their visit to the Earth Centre


Limitations

More detailed limitations are discussed in the detailed sections above, however, it can generally be noted:
  • The project is a relatively short input into the overall curriculum and the child’s life as a whole – relating any measurable effects to this particular project is not always possible.
  • The aim of the project, ultimately, is to change lifestyles to which the evaluator has no direct access.
  • If change can not be measured or identified it does not necessarily mean a positive effect has not taken place, either now or in the future.